INVENTING MEDICAL REALITY
-with a new introduction-
by Jon Rappoport
May 19, 2012
Breaking News: Click here to access all the articles on this FDA Genocide Murder news story.
INTRODUCTION:
Now that I've shown the FDA is completely aware their approved medical drugs are killing 100,000 Americans a year, we move to the next fact:
They're also aware that hundreds and thousands of published studies are FAKE.
We are constantly being told that we can trust the medical research that is published in peer-reviewed journals. This is the 'evidence' for Evidence-Based Medicine. The gold standard of proof for safety and effectiveness of all currently used drugs, vaccines and surgical procedures. But most of this information is not backed by real evidence. And much of it is overly-influenced by the drug companies that produce and profit from the treatment in question.
Here, John Rappoport gives an excellent critique of how this sort of mass-deception is allowed to occur and why our regulators turn a blind eye to the terrible, almost overwhelming, toll this takes on our population.
Pingback: Dr Jerzy Jaśkowski: Znajomi króliczka czyli “Flu Forum 2012” pani prof. Lidii Brydak. (Czesc II)
Pingback: Dr Jerzy Jaśkowski – Kongres Wakcynologów czy spotkanie handlowców. Argument siły czy siła argumentów!? Pogrobowcy nauki. (Czesc II)
Pingback: Kongres Wakcynologów czy spotkanie handlowców « Norwid Blog
Pingback: Dr Jerzy Jaśkowski: Sezon na leszcza, czyli jak oskubać społeczeństwo na “szczepionkę” ( część II )
Hey australiansceptics. You cannot publish stuff like this. Its true.
You see the reason why Matthew Carey’s LeftBrainRightBrain and Dr David Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blogs get all their groupie hangers on commenting is because pretty much none of what they publish is true. They provoke controversy by making palpably false claims.
The groupie hangers on then pile in for sport. They enjoy it.
So the problem for them here, you see, is that they know they are going to lose the argument and they cannot then apply their usual tricks – like deleting information from submission which prove them wrong or not posting submission and their all time favourite which is not publishing replies and then pretending the other person cannot and piling in criticising them. That is Matthew Carey’s #1 fallback and his groupies never let him down.
Is there a psychiatric term for that kind of thing?
Clifford, sites like Respectful Insolence and LBRB don’t moderate comments – anyone critical of them can have their say.
Yet here and with every other antivaccine blog I have ever encountered (including your own), censorship of dissenting views and moderation is ruthlessly exercised, and critical comments stand little hope of getting through.
Now why do you think that might be?